Capacity markets and cogeneration facilities: recommendations for Poland
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
IGSMiE PAN – Instytut Gospodarki Surowcami Mineralnymi i Energią PAN, Kraków
 
 
Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 2016;19(3):61-76
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
For over a decade, there has been a heated debate across all EU Member States in regard to the ambitious project of developing an integrated EU energy market, the design and implementation of internal capacity remuneration mechanisms, and the current situation of electricity generation and resource adequacy of each Member State. According to the Agency for Cooperation of Energy Regulators and the European Commission, approximately 11 Member States are considering or have implemented some form of capacity remuneration mechanism. In view of the recent debate on the possible market reform and implementation of a capacity market in Poland, this paper (1) presents an overview of two capacity market designs presently implemented in the US and in the UK and (2) examines how these capacity markets have incorporated autogeneration units in their capacity market model. Furthermore, this paper proposes a set of recommendations (based on lessons learned from the US and UK) aimed to minimize the level of regulatory uncertainties associated with the introduction of a capacity auction mechanism in Poland.
METADATA IN OTHER LANGUAGES:
Polish
Rynki zdolności wytwórczych a kogeneracja: rekomendacje dla Polski
mechanizm wynagradzania zdolności wytwórczych, jednostka kogeneracyjna, energetyka przemysłowa
Praktycznie we wszystkich państwach członkowskich Unii Europejskiej, od ponad dziesięciu lat, trwa gorąca debata dotycząca ambitnego projektu rozwoju zintegrowanego, wspólnego rynku energii, projektowania i wdrażania mechanizmów wynagradzania mocy wytwórczych oraz aktualnej sytuacji w sektorze wytwarzania energii elektrycznej, w kontekście adekwatności zasobów. Według Agencji Współpracy Organów Regulacji Energetyki (ACER) oraz Komisji Europejskiej, około 11 państw członkowskich Unii Europejskiej rozważa lub już wprowadziło pewną formę mechanizmu wynagradzania mocy wytwórczych. W świetle niedawnej debaty na temat ewentualnej reformy rynku energii elektrycznej oraz wdrożenia w Polsce rynku mocy, w artykule (1) przedstawiono dwa podstawowe typy rynkowych mechanizmów zdolności wytwórczych funkcjonujących w Stanach Zjednoczonych i w Wielkiej Brytanii oraz (2) przeanalizowano jak w ramach tych modeli rynków uwzględniona została energetyka przemysłowa. Ponadto, w artykule zaproponowano szereg zaleceń (na podstawie wniosków wyciągniętych z funkcjonowania rynków mocy w USA i Wielkiej Brytanii), których celem jest zminimalizowanie niepewności regulacyjnych związanych z wprowadzeniem mechanizmu aukcyjnego w Polsce.
 
REFERENCES (35)
1.
Bhagwat et al. 2016 – Bhagwat, P.C., de Vries, L.J. and Hobbs, B.F. 2016. Expert survey on capacity markets in the US: Lessons for the EU. Utilities Policy vol. 38, pp. 11–17.
 
2.
Bowring, J. 2013. Capacity Markets in PJM. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 47–64.
 
3.
Cramton et al. 2013 – Cramton, P., Ockenfels, S. and Stoft, S. 2013. Capacity Market Fundamentals. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 27–46.
 
4.
Cramton, P. and Ockenfels, A. 2012. Economics and Design of Capacity Markets for the Power Sector. Zeitschrift für Energiewirtschaft vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 113–134.
 
5.
DECC 2013 – Electricity Market Reform: Capacity Market – Detailed Design Proposals. UK Department of Energy and Climate Change.
 
6.
DECC 2014 – Implementing Electricity Market Reform (EMR). UK Department of Energy and Climate Change. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/... [Accessed: 7.6.2015].
 
7.
Deloitte 2014 – T-4 Capacity Market Auction 2014. Auction Monitor Report. [Online] Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/... [Accessed: 12.7.2016].
 
8.
DNV GL 2014 – Potential Interactions between Capacity Mechanisms in France and Germany. Descriptive Overview, Cross-border Impacts and Challenges. Agora Energiewende, Bonn 2014.
 
9.
DOE 2005 – Energy Policy Act of 2005. US Department of Energy. [Online] Available at: http://energy.gov/sites/prod/f... [Accessed: 19.7.2016].
 
10.
European Commission 2016 – Interim Report of the Sector Inquiry on Capacity Mechanisms. [Online] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/competitio... [Accessed: 2.8.2016].
 
11.
FAE 2015 – Elements of Market Design for Poland. Forum of Energy Analysis. Warsaw 2015.
 
12.
FERC 2016a – Regional Transmission Organizations (RTO)/Independent System Operators (ISO). FERC. [Online] Available at: http://www.ferc.gov/industries... [Accessed: 2.7.2016].
 
13.
FERC 2016b – What is a Qualifying Facility? FERC. [Online] Available at: http://www.ferc.gov/industries... [Accessed: 19.7.2016].
 
14.
FERC 2016c – Part 292—Regulations under sections 201 and 210 of the public utility regulatory policies act of 1978 with regard to small power production and cogeneration. FERC. [Online] Available at: http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/te... [Accessed: 19.7.2016].
 
15.
Hancher et al., ed. 2015 – Hancher, L., De Hauteclocque, A. and Sadowska, M., ed. 2015. Capacity Mechanisms in the EU Energy Market. Ed. 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 65 p.
 
16.
[Online] Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/... [Accessed: 7.6.2015].
 
17.
IECA 2016 – Technical Conference on implementation issues under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 Docket No. AD16-16-000. Industrial Energy Consumers of America Comments of the Industrial Energy Consumers of America. [Online] Available at: http://www.ferc.gov/eventcalen... Accessed: 24.7.2016].
 
18.
Keay, M. 2016. Electricity markets are broken – can they be fixed? Oxford Institute for Energy Studies.
 
19.
Kowalczyk, I. 2008. Barriers to the expansion of electrical co-generation by the wood products industry in the United States. Business-Industry Political Action Committee. [Online] Available at: http://www.bipac.net/mwv/Secti... [Accessed: 14.7.2016].
 
20.
National Grid 2015 – Provisional Auction Results. T-4 Capacity Market Auction for 2019/20.
 
21.
NERA 2014 –The British Capacity Market: Reflections on a Visible Hand. Nera Economic Consulting. London. [Online] Available at: http://www.nera.com/publicatio... [Accessed: 28.7.2016].
 
22.
OFGEM 2016a – Annual Report on the Operation of the Capacity Market in 2015.Office of Gas and Electricity Markets. [Online] Available at: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publi... [Accessed: 29.7.2016].
 
23.
OFGEM 2016b – Open letter: Charging arrangements for embedded generation. Office of Gas and Electricity Markets. [Online] Available at: https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/publi... [Accessed: 29.7.2016].
 
24.
Pfeifenberger et al. 2014 – Pfeifenberger, J., Newell, S., Spees, K., Murray, A. and Karkatsouli, I., 2014 – Third Triennial Review of PJM’ s Variable Resource Requirement Curve. The Brattle Group.
 
25.
PJM 2016a – 2016 Quarterly State of the Market Report for PJM: January through March. Monitoring Analytics, LLC. [Online] Available at: Available at: http://www.monitoringanalytics... [Accessed: 20.7.2016].
 
26.
PJM 2016b – PJM Manual 18: PJM Capacity Market Revision 32. PJM Capacity Market Operations. [Online] Available at: https://www.pjm.com/~/media/do... [Accessed: 1.8.2016].
 
27.
Rose, K. 2011. An examination of RTO Capacity Markets. IPU Working Paper No. 2011-4. Institute of Public Utilities Regulatory Research and Education, pp. 1–20.
 
28.
RTE 2014 – French Capacity Market, Report accompanying the draft rules. RTE, Paris 2014.
 
29.
Soden, J. and Aldina, R. 2013. A Guide to Inform Institutions about Participation in PJM’s Demand Response. Nicholas School of the Environment of Duke University.
 
30.
Spees et al. 2011 – Spees, K., Newell, S., Carlton, R., Zhou, B. and Pfeifenberger, J. 2011. Cost of New Entry Estimates for Combustion Turbine and Combined-Cycle Plants in PJM. The Brattle Group.
 
31.
Spees et al. 2013 – Spees, K., Newell, S. i Pfeifenberger, J. 2013. Capacity Markets–Lessons Learned from the First Decade. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–26.
 
32.
Sueyoshi, T. and Goto, M. 2013. A comparative study among fossil fuel power plants in PJM and California ISO by DEA environmental assessment. Energy Economics vol. 40, pp. 130–145.
 
33.
Wilson, 2010. Forward Capacity Market CONEfusion. The Electricity Journal vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 25–40.
 
34.
Zamasz et al. 2014 – Zamasz, K., Kamiński, J. and Saługa, P. 2014. Rynki mocy w warunkach krajowego sektora wytwórczego. Rynek Energii vol. 6, pp 10–15.
 
35.
Zamasz, K. 2015. Efektywność ekonomiczna przedsiębiorstwa energetycznego w warunkach wprowadzenia rynku mocy. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
 
eISSN:2720-569X
ISSN:1429-6675
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top