For Reviewers
 
An article must receive two positive reviews to be published. The reviewers are chosen by the Editorial Board and receive the full manuscript and the review form.

Guidelines for reviewing manuscripts:
• Each article undergoes a thorough evaluation by at least two reviewers,
• The Editorial Board uses the so-called double-blind review process, which means that the identity of both the reviewer and the author is concealed,
• The review consists in evaluating the value of the article by filling in the appropriate form in the Journal's Editorial System. It must end with an unambiguous conclusion as to the admission of an article for publication or its rejection. The reviewer may provide comments conditioning the admission of the article for publication and / or corrections made on the electronic version of the article submitted to him for review;
• The reviewer should pay special attention to the originality of the manuscript. If plagiarism is found, this should be described in the review and will constitute the basis for the rejection of the manuscript,
• The names of reviewers are not disclosed. The list of reviewers is published annually in the last issue of the Journal and on journal’s website.

The Editorial Board kindly asks reviewers to promptly prepare the review and to submit it in the Editorial System of the Journal.

Review form
 
ISSN:1429-6675