ORIGINAL PAPER
An assessment of the sustainability and security of energy systems: an analysis of the energy trilemma index on the example of Russia, Kazakhstan and Armenia
More details
Hide details
1
Russian-Armenian University, Armenia
2
Kazan State Power Engineering University, Russia
Submission date: 2023-02-03
Final revision date: 2023-04-05
Acceptance date: 2023-04-17
Publication date: 2023-06-19
Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 2023;26(2):23-46
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Ensuring access to sustainable, affordable and clean energy sources is a top priority of the global energy agenda. It is reflected in the seventh goal of the UN Sustainable Development Agenda with the three dimensions of economic growth, social inclusion and environmental protection. The seventh goal is aimed at providing the sustainable development of energy systems whilst taking into account these dimensions. To assess the development trends of national energy systems within the framework of the global energy agenda, certain methods of quantitative measurement have acquired particular relevance. Approaches to assessing energy security mainly depend on the interpretation of the “energy security” concept. The main methods for the integrated assessment of the energy security of states are generally compiled by international organizations. An important indicator for the measurement of the sustainable development of energy systems is the Energy Trilemma Index, built within the framework of the “energy trilemma” concept. It allows quantifying the ability of states to ensure energy security, energy equity and environmental sustainability, taking into account the national context.
Special attention is paid to the analysis of the energy systems of Russia, Kazakhstan and Armenia through the Energy Trilemma Index 2022. The studied countries actively participate in the integration processes in the Eurasian and post-Soviet space. Thus, the analysis of the Energy Trilemma Index 2022 allows us to become acquainted with the main trends of the energy sector development in the Eurasian space, exploring the conjuncture of energy markets and their main challenges. The study of the energy systems of Russia, Kazakhstan and Armenia through the energy trilemma index enables the identification the methodological significance of the index for assessing the sustainable development of national energy systems. The practical relevance of the index in the formation of the state energy policy for the sustainable development of the energy systems has also been emphasized.
METADATA IN OTHER LANGUAGES:
Polish
Ocena trwałości i bezpieczeństwa systemów energetycznych: analiza wskaźnika trylematu energetycznego na przykładzie Rosji, Kazachstanu i Armenii
wskaźnik trylematu energetycznego, bezpieczeństwo energetyczne, równość energetyczna, zrównoważenie środowiskowe
Zapewnienie dostępu do zrównoważonych, przystępnych cenowo i czystych źródeł energii jest jednym z głównych priorytetów globalnej agendy energetycznej. Znajduje to odzwierciedlenie w siódmym celu Agendy Zrównoważonego Rozwoju ONZ z trzema wymiarami wzrostu gospodarczego, włączenia społecznego i ochrony środowiska. Siódmy cel ma na celu zapewnienie zrównoważonego rozwoju systemów energetycznych z uwzględnieniem tych wymiarów. Do oceny tendencji rozwojowych krajowych systemów energetycznych w ramach globalnej agendy energetycznej szczególnego znaczenia nabrały pewne metody pomiaru ilościowego. Podejścia do oceny bezpieczeństwa energetycznego zależą głównie od interpretacji pojęcia „bezpieczeństwo energetyczne”. Główne metody zintegrowanej oceny bezpieczeństwa energetycznego państw są na ogół opracowywane przez organizacje międzynarodowe. Ważnym wskaźnikiem pomiaru zrównoważonego rozwoju systemów energetycznych jest Energy Trilemma Index, zbudowany w ramach koncepcji energy trilemma. Pozwala na ilościowe określenie zdolności państw do zapewnienia bezpieczeństwa energetycznego, równości energetycznej i zrównoważenia środowiskowego, z uwzględnieniem kontekstu krajowego.
Szczególną uwagę poświęcono analizie systemów energetycznych Rosji, Kazachstanu i Armenii poprzez Energy Trilemma Index 2022. Badane kraje aktywnie uczestniczą w procesach integracyjnych w przestrzeni euroazjatyckiej i poradzieckiej. Tym samym analiza Energy Trilemma Index 2022 pozwala nam zapoznać się z głównymi trendami rozwoju sektora energetycznego w przestrzeni euroazjatyckiej, eksplorując koniunkcję rynków energii i stojące przed nimi główne wyzwania. Badanie systemów energetycznych Rosji, Kazachstanu i Armenii za pomocą wskaźnika trylematu energetycznego umożliwia określenie metodologicznego znaczenia wskaźnika dla oceny zrównoważonego rozwoju krajowych systemów energetycznych. Podkreślono również praktyczne znaczenie wskaźnika w kształtowaniu polityki energetycznej państwa dla zrównoważonego rozwoju systemów energetycznych.
REFERENCES (37)
1.
Cherp, A. and Jewell, J. 2014. The concept of energy security: beyond the four “A”. Energy Policy 75, pp. 415–421, DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.005.
2.
Davtyan, V. 2018. Armenian NPP: problems of electricity export. MATEC Web Conf. 212, 2018 International Scientific Conference “Investment, Construction, Real Estate: New Technologies and Special-Purpose Development Priorities” (ICRE 2018), pp. 1–7, DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/201821202010.
3.
Energy Strategic Development Program of the Republic of Armenia (until 2040). Decree of the Government of the Republic of Armenia N 48-L dated January 14, 2021. [Online]
http://mtad.am/u_files/ file/energy/razmavarutyun-arm.pdf [Accessed: 2022-03-23].
4.
Energy strategy of the Russian Federation until 2035. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of June 9, 2020 No. 1523-r.
5.
International energy security risk index: risk assessment in the global energy market. Global Energy Institute. Trading US chamber. 2020.
6.
Jewell, J. 2011. The IEA Model of Short Term Energy Security (MOSES). Primary energy sources and secondary fuels (working paper). Paris: IEA.
7.
Kang, H. 2022. An Analysis of the Relationship between Energy Trilemma and Economic Growth. Sustainability 14(7), DOI: 10.3390/su14073863.
8.
Khan et al. 2021 – Khan, I., Hou, F., Irfan, M., Zakari, A. and Le, H.P. 2021. Does energy trilemma a driver of economic growth? The roles of energy use, population growth, and financial development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 146, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111157.
9.
Kononov, Yu.D. 2018. Analytical review of advanced foreign experience of a comprehensive assessment of energy security (Analiticheskiy obzor peredovogo zarubezhnogo opyta kompleksnoy otsenki energeticheskoy bezopasnosti). Energy Policy 6, pp. 98–107 (in Russian).
10.
Koyama, K. and Kutani, I. 2012. Energy Security Index Development Study and Energy Security Assessment for East Asian Countries. ERIA Research Project Report 2011–2013. Jakarta: ERIA, pp. 7–47.
11.
Kuntjoro et al. 2021 – Kuntjoro, Y.D., Khotimah, K. and Agustiani, R. 2021. Indonesian Energy Security Concept for Improving the Sustainability of New and Renewable Energy Sources in Indonesia with a Five-fold Helix Model: 4A +1S for National Defense. IOP conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Sciences 753, DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/753/1/012045.
12.
Kuzemko et al. 2022 – Kuzemko, C., Blondeel, M., Dupont, C. and Brisbois, M.C. 2022. Russia’s war on Ukraine, European energy policy responses & implications for sustainable transformations. Energy Research & Social Science 93, DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102842.
13.
Loktionov, V.I. 2018. Russia on the Way to Sustainable Energy (Rossiya na puti k ustoychivoy energetike). National Interests: Priorities and Security 14(4), pp. 725–740, DOI: 10.24891/ni.14.4.725 (in Russian).
14.
Markarov, A. and Davtyan, V. 2021. Integration of Armenia into the Common Electricity Market of the EAEU: Risks and Opportunities (Integratsiya Armenii v Obshchiy rynok elektroenergii YEAES: riski i vozmozhnosti). Geoeconomics of Energy 2(14), pp. 124–138 (in Russian).
15.
Mastepanov, A. and Chigarev, B. 2020. Using the energy trilemma index to assess energy security (Ispol’zovaniye indeksa energeticheskoy trilemmy dlya otsenki energeticheskoy bezopasnosti). Energy Policy 8(150), pp. 66–83, DOI: 10.46920/2409-5516_2020_8150_66 (in Russian).
16.
Medzhidova, D. and Grigoryev, L. 2020. Trilemma of global energy. Russian Journal of Economics 6(4), pp. 437–462, DOI: 10.32609/j.ruje.6.58683.
19.
On topical issues of energy infrastructure development as part of the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan for the Modernization and Expansion of the Main Infrastructure for the Period up to 2024. Decree of the Federation Council of March 25, 2020, № 139-SF. [Online]
http://council.gov.ru/activity... [Accessed: 2022-03-23] (in Russian).
21.
Rosatom designed the nuclear power plant in such a way as to exclude the emission of 210 million tons of CO2 per year. Rosatom. [Online]
https://www.rusatom-overseas.c... [Accessed: 2022-03-23].
22.
Secrieru et al. 2021 – Secrieru, S., Saari, S. and Bechev, D. 2021. Fire and Ice: The Russian-Turkish partnership. Chaillot Paper 168, 21 pp. [Online]
https://www.iss.europa.eu/site... [Accessed: 2023-04-03].
23.
Shirazi et al. 2023 – Shirazi, M., Fuinhas, J.A. and Silva, N. 2023. Sustainable economic development and geopolitics: The role of energy trilemma policies. Sustainable Development, pp. 1–21, DOI: 10.1002/sd.2523.
24.
Simonova, M.D. and Zakharov, V.E. 2016. Statistical analysis of trends in the development of global renewable energy (Statisticheskiy analiz tendentsiy razvitiya mirovoy vozobnovlyayemoy energetiki). Bulletin of International Relations MGIMO 3(48), pp. 214–220 (in Russian).
25.
Sovacool, B.K. and Mukherjee, I. 2011. Conceptualization and measurement of energy security: a synthesized approach. Energy 36, pp. 5343–5355.
26.
Strategy for the socio-economic development of the Russian Federation with a low level of greenhouse gas emissions until 2050. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of October 29, 2021 No. 3052-r.
27.
Šprajc et al. 2019 – Šprajc, P., Bjegović, M. and Vasić, B. 2019. Energy security in decision making and governance – Methodological analysis of energy trilemma index. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 114, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109341.
28.
Taxonomy of green projects and Russian recommendations on green finance. Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of September 21, 2021 No. 1587.
31.
US Energy Security Risk Index: Assessing America’s Vulnerability in the Global Energy Market. Global Energy Institute. Trading US chamber. 2020.
33.
World Energy Trilemma Index 2021 Report. WEC in partnership with Oliver Wyman Group. London, 2021. [Online]
https://www.worldenergy.org/as... [Accessed: 2022-03-23].
34.
World Energy Trilemma Index 2022 report. WEC in partnership with Oliver Wyman Group. London, 2022. [Online]
https://www.worldenergy.org/as... [Accessed: 2022-03-23].
35.
World Nuclear Power Performance Report 2021. COP 26 Edition. BHA. 2021.
36.
Yergin, D. 2006. Ensuring Energy Security. Foreign Affairs 85(2), pp. 69–82, DOI: 10.2307/20031912.
37.
Zakharov, A.N. 2017. Global Energy Problem: New Challenges and Threats, Opportunities to Overcome Them (Global’naya energeticheskaya problema: novyye vyzovy i ugrozy, vozmozhnosti ikh preodoleniya). MGIMO Bulletin of International Relations 1(52), pp. 187–200 (in Russian).