ORIGINAL PAPER
Forecasting solar generation in energy systems to accelerate the implementation of sustainable economic development
More details
Hide details
1
National University of Water Management and Environmental Engineering, 33028, Rivne city, 11 Soborna St., Ukraine, Ukraine
2
National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 54 Volodymyrska Street str., 01030 Kyiv, Ukraine, Ukraine
3
Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
4
Etalontechservice LLC, Kharkiv, Ukraine, Jubilee Avenue, 28a, Kharkiv, Ukraine, Ukraine
5
AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland
6
Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University, Mykolaiv, Ukraine, 68 Paratroop-ers Street, 54000 Nikolaev, Ukraine, Ukraine
Submission date: 2021-07-04
Final revision date: 2021-08-06
Acceptance date: 2021-08-08
Publication date: 2021-09-22
Corresponding author
Piotr Olczak
Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, Poland
Polityka Energetyczna – Energy Policy Journal 2021;24(3):5-28
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
The analysis and assessment of the development of solar energy were carried out and it was noted that the production of solar electricity in the world has increased by more than 15% over the last year. In 2020 there are more than 37 countries with a total photovoltaic capacity of more than one GW, and the share of solar energy in total world electricity production was 8.15%. In the regional context, the largest production of electricity by solar energy sources is in Asia (at the expense of India and China) and North America (USA). The study assesses the main factors in the development of solar energy from the standpoint of environmental friendliness and stability of the electricity supply. The problem of the utilization of solar station equipment in the EU and the US is considered. According to the IPCC, IEA, Solar Power Europe, forecasting the development of solar energy in the world is considered. It is proved that the main factor in assessing the economic efficiency of solar energy production is a regional feature due to natural and climatic conditions (intensity of solar radiation). The use of solar generation is auxiliary for the operation of modern electrical networks as long as the efficiency of photovoltaic cells increases by at least 60–65%. Marginal costs of solar energy are minimal in those countries where active state support is provided.
The competitiveness of solar energy is relatively low. However, from the standpoint of replacing energy fuel at a cost of USD 10 per 1 Gcal of solar energy saves 10–20 million tons of conventional fuel. Industrial production of solar electricity at modern solar power plants forms a price at the level of USD 250–450 for 1 MWh.
METADATA IN OTHER LANGUAGES:
Polish
Prognozowanie wytwarzania energii słonecznej w systemach energetycznych w celu przyspieszenia implementacji zrównoważonego rozwoju gospodarczego
energia słoneczna, produkcja i zużycie energii elektrycznej, taryfa „zielona”, utylizacja paneli słonecznych
Przeprowadzono analizę rozwoju energetyki słonecznej w zakresie wzrostu produkcji energii słonecznej na świecie (wzrost w ostatnim roku o ponad 15%). Dane z roku 2020 pokazują, że jest ponad 37 krajów w których łączna moc zainstalowana w fotowoltaice przekracza 1 GW, a udział energii słonecznej w całkowitej światowej produkcji energii elektrycznej wyniósł 8,15%. W kontekście regionalnym największa produkcja energii elektrycznej ze źródeł energii słonecznej występuje w Azji (głównie Chiny i Indie) oraz w Ameryce Północnej (USA). W pracy oceniono główne czynniki rozwoju energetyki słonecznej z punktu widzenia przyjazności dla środowiska i stabilności dostaw energii elektrycznej. Rozważany jest także problem wykorzystania wyposażenia stacji fotowoltaicznych w UE i USA. Z uwzględnieniem IPCC, IEA, Solar Power Europe analizowany jest także aspekt prognozowania rozwoju energetyki słonecznej na świecie. W pracy wykazano, że głównym czynnikiem oceny efektywności ekonomicznej produkcji energii słonecznej jest zróżnicowanie regionalne ze względu na warunki naturalne i klimatyczne (natężenie promieniowania słonecznego). Ponadto wykorzystywanie energii słonecznej ma charakter pomocniczy w pracy nowoczesnych sieci elektrycznych, o ile sprawność ogniw fotowoltaicznych wzrośnie o co najmniej 60–65% (w stosunku do stanu obecnego).
Koszty krańcowe wykorzystania energii słonecznej są minimalne w krajach, w których udzielane jest aktywne wsparcie państwa. Natomiast konkurencyjność energii słonecznej jest stosunkowo niska. Ocenia się że zastępując paliwa energetyczne o koszcie 10 USD za 1 Gcal, dzięki energii słonecznej oszczędza się 10–20 mln ton paliwa konwencjonalnego rocznie. Przemysłowa produkcja energii słonecznej w nowoczesnych elektrowniach słonecznych kształtuje się na poziomie 250–450 USD za 1 MWh.
REFERENCES (50)
1.
Alawaji, S.H. 2001. Evaluation of solar energy research and its applications in Saudi Arabia – 20 years of experience. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 5, pp. 59–77, DOI: 10.1016/S1364-0321(00)00006-X.
2.
Alster et al. 2021 – Alster, G., Brown, S. and Broadbent, H. 2021. Monthly European insights – ember. Ember-climate.org. [Online]
https://www.ember-climate.org [Accessed: 2021-02-05].
4.
Ciuła et al. 2019 – Ciuła, J., Gaska, K., Siedlarz, D. and Koval, V. 2019. Management of sewage sludge energy use with the application of bi-functional bioreactor as an element of pure production in industry. E3S Web Conf. 123, 1016, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201912301016.
5.
David et al. 2020 – David, T.M., Silva Rocha Rizol, P.M., Guerreiro Machado, M.A. and Buccieri, G.P. 2020. Future research tendencies for solar energy management using a bibliometric analysis, 2000–2019. Heliyon 6, e04452, DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04452.
9.
Gielen et al. 2019 – Gielen, D., Boshell, F., Saygin, D., Bazilian, M.D., Wagner, N. and Gorini, R. 2019. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strateg. Rev. 24, 38–50, DOI: 10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006.
10.
Haddad et al. 2019 – Haddad, M., Nicod, J., Mainassara, Y.B., Rabehasaina, L., Al Masry, Z. and Péra, M. 2019. Wind and solar forecasting for renewable energy system using SARIMA-based model. [In:] International Conference on Time Series and Forecasting, Gran Canaria.
11.
Hák et al. 2019 – Hák, T., Janoušková, S. and Moldan, B. 2016. Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecol. Indic. 60, pp. 565–573, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003.
12.
Hayes, J. 2012. A study on the effects of solar power. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas.
13.
Household... 2021. Household electricity prices worldwide in September 2020, by select country. [Online]
https://www.statista.com [Accessed: 2021-05-11].
14.
Hutsaliuk et al. 2020 – Hutsaliuk, O., Koval, V., Tsimoshynska, O., Koval, M. and Skyba, H. 2020. Risk Management of Forming Enterprises Integration Corporate Strategy. TEM J. 9, pp. 1514–1523, DOI: 10.18421/TEM94-26.
17.
Kaczmarzewski et al. 2019 – Kaczmarzewski, S., Olczak, P. and Halbina, A. 2019. Issues of photovoltaic installation size choice for a hard coal mine. E3S Web of Conferences, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201912301014.
18.
Kaliappan et al. 2019 – Kaliappan, K., Sankar, M., Karthikeyan, B., Vineeth, B. and Raju, V.C. 2019. Analysis of solar energy technology in leading countries. International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems 10(4), 1995.
19.
Koval et al. 2019a – Koval, V., Sribna, Y. and Gaska, K. 2019a. Energy Cooperation Ukraine–Poland to Strengthen Energy Security. E3S Web Conf. 132, 1009, DOI: 10.1051/e3sconf/201913201009.
20.
Koval et al. 2019b – Koval, V., Sribna, Y., Mykolenko, O. and Vdovenko, N. 2019b. Environmenta concept of energy security solutions of local communities based on energy logistics. 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2019, International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference-SGEM. STEF92 Technology, 51 Alexander Malinov blvd, Sofia, 1712, Bulgaria, pp. 283–290, DOI: 10.5593/sgem2019/5.3/S21.036.
21.
Kumar, M. 2020. Social, economic, and environmental impacts of renewable energy resources. [In:] Okedu, K.E. (ed.), Wind Solar Hybrid Renewable Energy System. IntechOpen, DOI: 10.8772/interopen77440.
22.
Lewis, N.S. 2016. Research opportunities to advance solar energy utilization. Science 351(6271), pp. 62–71, DOI: 10.1126/science.aad1920.
23.
Majchrzak et al. 2021 – Majchrzak, K., Olczak, P., Matuszewska, D. and Wdowin, M. 2021. Economic and environmental assessment of the use of electric cars in Poland. Energy Policy Journal 24, pp. 153–168.
24.
Mikhno et al. 2021 – Mikhno, I., Koval, V., Shvets, G., Garmatiuk, O. and Tamosiuniene, R. 2021. Green Economy in Sustainable Development and Improvement of Resource Efficiency. Cent. Eur. Bus. Rev. 10, pp. 99–113, DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.252.
25.
Mirowski, T. and Sornek, K. 2015. Potential of prosumer power engineering in Poland by example of micro PV installation in private construction. Energy Policy Journal 18, pp. 73–84.
26.
Mulatu, M.A. 2017. Energy cooperation in communication of energy harvesting tags. AEU – Int. J. Electron. Commun. 71, pp. 145–151, DOI: 10.1016/j.aeue.2016.10.016.
27.
Najmabadi, S. 2021. Texans blindsided by massive electric bills await details of Gov. Greg Abbott’s promised relief. Texas Trib. [Online]
https://www.sanmarcosrecord.co... [Accessed: 2021-05-11].
28.
Ohta, H. 2020. The Analysis of Japan’s Energy and Climate Policy from the Aspect of Anticipatory Governance. Energies 13(19), DOI: 10.3390/en13195153.
29.
Olczak et al. 2021 – Olczak, P., Olek, M., Matuszewska, D., Dyczko, A. and Mania, T. 2021. Monofacial and Bifacial Micro PV Installation as Element of Energy Transition – The Case of Poland. Energies 14(2), DOI: 10.3390/en14020499.
30.
Owusu, P.A. and Asumadu-Sarkodie, S. 2016. A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Eng. 3, 1167990, DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2016.1167990.
31.
Pattanaik et al. 2020 – Pattanaik, D., Mishra, S., Khuntia, G.P., Dash, R. and Swain, S.C. 2020. An innovative learning approach for solar power forecasting using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network. Open Eng. 10, pp. 630–641, DOI: 10.1515/eng–2020-0073.
32.
Ravirajan, P. 2017. Solar energy for sustainable development in developing countries. Ceylon Journal of Science 46(2), DOI: 10.4038/cjs.v46i2.7424.
34.
Shahsavari, A. and Akbari, M. 2018. Potential of solar energy in developing countries for reducing energy-related emissions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 90, pp. 275–291, DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.065.
36.
Spillias et al. 2020 – Spillias, S., Kareiva, P., Ruckelshaus, M. and McDonald-Madden, E. 2020. Renewable energy targets may undermine their sustainability. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, pp. 974–976. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-020-00939-x.
37.
Sustainability... 2019. Sustainability Leadership Standard for Photovoltaic Modules and Photovoltaic Inverters, 2019. Michigan.
39.
Total installed... 2020. Total installed power capacity by fuel and technology 2019–2025, main case. Int. Energy Agency. [Online]
https://www.iea.org/ [Accessed: 2021-02-21].
40.
Transforming... 2015. Transforming Our World: An Agenda for Sustainable Development until 2030. United Nation. [Online]
https://sustainabledevelopment... [Accessed: 2021-02-21].
41.
Tsimoshynska et al. 2021 – Tsimoshynska, O., Koval, M., Kryshtal, H., Filipishyna, L., Arsawan, W.E. and Koval, V. 2021. Investing in road construction infrastructure projects under public-private partnership in the form of concession. Nauk. Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, pp. 184–192, DOI: 10.33271/nvngu/2021-2/184.
43.
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine 2020. About modification of some laws of Ukraine concerning improvement. Kyiv.
44.
Viebahn et al. 2011 – Viebahn, P., Lechon, Y. and Trieb, F. 2011. The potential role of concentrated solar power (CSP) in Africa and Europe – A dynamic assessment of technology development, cost development and life cycle inventories until 2050. Energy Policy 39, pp. 4420–4430, 4421.
45.
Wan et al. 2015 – Wan, C., Zhao, J., Song, Y., Xu, Z., Lin, J. and Hu, Z. 2015. Photovoltaic and solar power forecasting for smart grid energy management. CSEE J. Power Energy Syst. 1, pp. 38–46, DOI: 10.17775/CSEEJPES.2015.00046.
46.
Wang et al. 2017 – Wang, Y., Luo, G. and Kang, H. 2017. Successes and Failures of China’s Golden-Sun Program, in: Proceedings of the 2017 6th International Conference on Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development (ICEESD 2017). Atlantis Press, pp. 585–606, DOI: 10.2991/iceesd-17.2017.109.
47.
Wang et al. 2019 – Wang, Q., Chang, P., Bai, R., Liu, W., Dai, J. and Tang, Y. 2019. Mitigation strategy for duck curve in high photovoltaic penetration power system using concentrating solar power station. Energies 12(18), DOI: 10.3390/en12183521.
48.
Weckend et al. 2016 – Weckend, S., Wade, A. and Garvin, H. 2016. End-of-life management: Solar Photovoltaic Panels. International Renewable Energy Agency.
49.
Wróblewski et al. 2021 – Wróblewski, P., Drożdż, W., Lewicki, W. and Miązek, P. 2021. Methodology for Assessing the Impact of Aperiodic Phenomena on the Energy Balance of Propulsion Engines in Vehicle Electromobility Systems for Given Areas. Energies 14(8), DOI: 10.3390/en14082314.
50.
Żelazna et al. 2020 – Żelazna, A., Gołębiowska, J., Zdyb, A. and Pawłowski, A. 2020. A hybrid vs. on-grid photovoltaic system: Multicriteria analysis of environmental, economic, and technical aspects in life cycle perspective. Energies 13(15), DOI: 10.3390/en13153978.